Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide and Sirolimus in Matched Related and Unrelated Allogeneic Transplant with a Treosulfan-Based Conditioning

Abstract Introduction: Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) has recently emerged as a very promising pharmacological strategy to overcome human leukocyte antigen (HLA) barriers in the setting of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). We recently reported a promising preliminary experience on the use of PT-Cy and sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in matched allo-HSCT (Greco R et al, Blood 2016). Herein we describe long-term outcomes of matched allogeneic HSCT, using treosulfan-based conditioning, and GVHD prophylaxis with PT-Cy and sirolimus. Methods: In our center, we collected 104 adult patients (pts) receiving matched HSCT for high-risk hematological malignancies, mainly acute myeloid leukemia (n=43). Donor was matched related (MRD) for 45 pts, 10/10 matched unrelated (MUD) for 39 pts and 9/10 MUD for 20 pts. Median age was 48 years (range 19-78). At HSCT, 51% of patients were not in complete remission (CR), 39% were in CR1 and 11% in subsequent CR. Graft source was mainly PBSCs (95%). All pts received a conditioning regimen based on treosulfan and fludarabine; 89% received an intensified conditioning with the addition of melphalan. All pts received PT-Cy (50 mg/kg/day) on days 3 and 4. Sirolimus was given from day 5, and withdrawn 3 months after HSCT. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was added from day 5 to day 30, only in MUD. All patients were treated according to current institutional programs upon written informed consent for transplant procedures. Results: Median follow up was over 16 months (range 3-51). Median CD34+ and CD3+ cell doses were 5.6x10^6/Kg (range, 1.5-10.9) and 2.0x10^8/Kg (range, 0.2-8.0), respectively. All the recipients of allo-HSCT experienced a sustained donor cell engraftment. The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD at 100 days was 21% and 9%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 25% at 2 years; we observed severe chronic GVHD only in 4% of pts. The cumulative incidences of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 33% and 8% at 2 years, respectively. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 67% and progression free survival (PFS) 59%. The composite end point of GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was 52% at 2 years, in which events include grade 3-4 acute GVHD, systemic therapy-requiring chronic GVHD, relapse, or death. There was a longer OS, 2-year OS was 77% (p = 0.05), and a trend towards higher PFS and GRFS, 63% (p=0.07) and 58% (p=0.06) respectively, for pts with CR status at HSCT. We did not found a significant effect of HLA-matching (9/10 versus 10/10) or donor type (related versus unrelated) on major transplant outcomes (NRM, PFS, GRFS, relapse, acute and chronic GvHD). Conclusion: These outcomes confirmed that matched allogeneic HSCT using treosulfan-based chemotherapy, PT-Cy and sirolimus, is associated with low NRM and acceptable severe GVHD, providing relevant long-term survival in high-risk diseases. A randomized trial comparing this strategy with other kind of in-vivo T-cell depletion (i.e. ATG) is warranted. Disclosures Vago: Moderna TX: Research Funding; GENDX: Research Funding.