Modified axial computed tomography classification of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: selecting the optimal operating procedure and enhancing the accuracy of prognosis

Background Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) causes spinal cord compression, which can lead to myelopathy or radiculopathy. Non-surgical treatments have little effect on this condition. Current OPLL classification systems offer little guidance on the selection of an appropriate operating procedure. In this study, we developed a modified axial computed tomography classification (MACTC) scheme. We then examined the usefulness of the MACTC scheme and two other existing classification schemes in guiding OPLL operation choice. Methods Following screening in which a defined exclusion criteria was used, a total of 91 patients with OPLL participated in the study. Patients' follow-up data for at least 2 years were obtained. The recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores was compared to two other classification schemes. Results According to the MACTC, central-sharp-type OPLL had a lower recovery rate of the JOA score than that of central-gentle-type OPLL (36.05±32.38 vs. 83.90±23.52, P≤0.05). The recovery rate of the JOA scores in the ipsilateral open-door OPLL group was significantly lower than that in the contralateral group of the lateral-steep type (36.67±41.5 vs. 88.89±17.21, P=0.04), but not of that in the lateral-gentle type. There was no significant difference in the recovery rates of the JOA scores between groups when using either existing classification scheme (P>0.05). Conclusions The MACTC scheme can assist surgeons to choose the most appropriate operating procedure, and provide an accurate prognosis. If operations on central-sharp-type OPLL are not performed using both the posterior and anterior approaches, prognosis will be poor. The contralateral side should be the first choice for door opening in laminoplasty, especially for patients with lateral-steep-type OPLL. Severe OPLL may not be an absolute contraindication for the posterior approach.