LAXITY DIFFERENCES IN CRUCIATE-RETAINING AND POSTERIOR-STABILISED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

IntroductionWhen performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgeons often utilize a posterior-stabilized (PS) design which compensates for the loss of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). These designs attempt to replicate normal knee kinematics and loading using a cam and post to provide posterior restraint of the tibia during flexion. However, these designs may not be able to compensate for the increase in flexion space or the inherent loss of coronal stability after PCL release compared to a cruciate retaining (CR) design. This study aimed to compare stability of PS and CR TKA designs by assessing laxity in three planes.MethodsThe specimens utilized in this study were lower extremities from fresh cadavers of donors who had previously undergone a total knee replacement (Medical Education and Research Institute (Memphis, TN) and Restore Life USA (Johnson City, TN)). IRB approval was obtained prior to performing the study. Twenty-three knee specimens (8 left, 15 right) were retrieved and all skin, subcu...