Evaluation of a health care transition improvement process in seven large health care systems

Abstract Purpose Youth and young adults require systematic planning, transfer and integration into adult healthcare. A national health care transition (HCT) learning network (LN) shared strategies during monthly calls to improve HCTs using Got Transition™'s Six Core Elements. Among LN participants, we conducted a pre-post mixed-methods evaluation of this evidence-informed process improvement framework. Design and methods Leaders from seven health systems in the LN recruited 55 participating practice sites (12 primary care, 43 specialty care, 47 pediatric care, and 8 adult care). Got Transition's Current Assessment (CA) of HCT Activities (possible score: 0–32) assessed implementation of HCT process improvements in all 55 sites at baseline (2015–2017) and again after 12–18 months. Pre-post results were compared overall and by type of practice (primary vs. specialty, pediatric vs. adult). In early 2018, health system leaders qualitatively described factors impacting HCT process implementation. Results Overall, baseline CA scores averaged 10.7, and increased to 17.9 after 12–18 months. Within each clinical setting, scores increased from: 10.8 to 16.5 among 12 primary care sites, 12.8 to 17.1 among 43 specialty sites, 12.4 to 17 among 47 pediatric sites, and 12 to 16.9 among 8 adult sites. All changes reached significance ( p Conclusions Participating systems made substantial progress in implementing a structured HCT process consistent with clinical recommendations using the Six Core Elements. Practice implications The diverse perspectives of participating health systems provide a model for creating sustainable HCT process improvements.