A propensity score-matched comparison of the efficacies of OK-432 and talc slurry for pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion induced by lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract Background The choice of an optimal sclerosant for pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion remains controversial. This retrospective clinical study compared the efficacy and safety of two sclerosants; talc slurry (talc-s) and OK-432. Methods We compared the characteristics, 30/90-day success rates, and adverse events in patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent pleurodesis by using either OK-432 or talc-s. Propensity score matching was used to compare the two scelrosants. Results Ninety-four patients (mean age=71.6±9.6 years) were included in this retrospective study, of whom 64 received OK-432 and 30 received talc-s. Seventy-three patients (77.6%) were initially diagnosed with clinical stage IV lung cancer, with a 28.7% epidermal growth factor receptor mutation frequency. The propensity score-matched cohort included 26 patients from each group. The 30-day success rates for OK-432 and talc-s were 80.7% and 76.9%, respectively (odds ratio: 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.33–4.77, p =0.73). Neither the overall incidence of adverse events nor the 90-day success rates differed significantly. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the predictors of 30-day success were lower drainage volume on the previous day, particularly Conclusions Propensity score-matched analyses showed that pleurodesis using OK-432 and talc-s demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety profiles in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. This indicated that OK-432 could be a viable alternative to talc-s in this procedure.