Efficacy of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and analysis of prognostic factors.

OBJECTIVE The study aims to compare the efficacies of the immunosuppressants most commonly prescribed for patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The predictors, which might be associated with relapse and disability in NMOSD, were also analyzed. METHODS This retrospective study included NMOSD patients treated with azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and rituximab (RTX). The annual relapse rate (ARR) and the incidence rates of adverse events were compared. Cox proportional-hazards model calculated the potential predictors of NMOSD relapse and disability. RESULTS A total of 83 patients were included. The median treatment time of AZA group (n = 34), MMF group (n = 20), and RTX group (n = 29) were 19.5, 15.5, and 12 months, respectively. ARR of the three groups reduced significantly after treatment. In the three groups, 55.9%, 50%, and 79.3% of patients, respectively, were free from relapse. However, the difference among the three groups was of no statistical significance, possibly due to the small sample size. During the treatment, 32.4%, 15%, and 24.1% of patients experienced adverse events in the AZA group, MMF group, and RTX group, respectively. Additionally, the multivariate Cox analyses indicated that history of a severe attack and disease duration were associated with the risk of relapse after immunotherapy. Late-onset (≥ 50 years old) NMOSD patients were probably more susceptible to motor disability, and those with optic neuritis at onset were more likely to develop visual disability. CONCLUSIONS AZA, MMF, and low-dose RTX were all effective in reducing the relapse rate in NMOSD. The age at onset, disease duration, history of severe attacks, and primary syndromes might be significant prognostic predictors in NMOSD.