Assessment of dyspnoea in the emergency department by numeric and visual scales: A pilot study

Abstract Objective(s) Dyspnoea is a common and often debilitating symptom that affects up to 50% of patients admitted to acute tertiary care hospitals. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for dyspnoea evaluation in the ED setting. Study design and patients This was a cohort study of patients admitted to the ED in a university hospital, with dyspnoea as the chief complaint. Methods The agreement of the two dyspnoea scales was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results One hundred and seventeen patients were included in this analysis. The median age for the whole study population was 67 years and 42% of patients were male. The aetiology of dyspnoea was acute heart failure (AHF) in 35% of patients. There was good agreement between the two scores (ICC = 0.795; 95% CI = 0.717–0.853; P Conclusions This pilot study demonstrated that numerical rating and visual analogue scales agree well when assessing the severity of dyspnoea in the ED. Further studies with larger cohorts of patients are needed to confirm these preliminary results.