Minimally invasive preperitoneal balloon tamponade and abdominal aortic junctional tourniquet versus open packing for pelvic fracture-associated hemorrhage: Not all extrinsic compression is equal

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive preperitoneal balloon tamponade (PPB) and abdominal aortic junctional tourniquets (AAJT) have been proposed as alternatives to open preperitoneal packing (OP) for the management of pelvic fracture-associated hemorrhage. We hypothesized that the PPB (SpaceMaker Pro) and AAJT would result in similar rates of survival and blood loss versus OP. METHODS: Thirty-two swine underwent creation of a combined open-book pelvic fracture and major iliac vascular injuries. Animals were randomized to no intervention (n = 7), OP (n = 10), PPB (n = 9), or AAJT (n = 6) at a mean arterial pressure 0.05). The injury was uniformly lethal without intervention, with survival time (mean) of 5 minutes, peak preperitoneal pressure (PP) of 14 mm Hg, blood loss of 960 g, and peak lactate of 2.6 mmol/L. Survival time was 44 minutes with OP versus 60 minutes with PPB and AAJT (p 0.05). Blood loss (g) was 850 with OP, 930 with PPB, and 600 with AAJT (p > 0.05). Peak lactate (mmol/L) was 3.3 with OP, 4.3 with PPB, and 6.3 with AAJT (p < 0.01). Only 33% of AAJT animals survived intervention reversal versus 60% for OP and 67% for PPB (p < 0.01). Necropsy revealed bowel/bladder injury in 50% of AAJT subjects versus 0% in all other arms (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Preperitoneal balloon tamponade is a safe and potentially effective alternative to OP for the management of lethal pelvic fracture-associated hemorrhage. Abdominal aortic junctional tourniquet offers a similar survival benefit to PPB but has concerning rates of ischemia-reperfusion and compressive abdominal organ injury.