X-RAY IMAGING OF ACETABULAR SHELLS: DO RADIOLUCENT LINES ALWAYS CORRELATE TO PHYSICAL GAP?

Introduction Various 2D and 3D surfaces are available for cementless fixation of acetabular cups. The goal of these surface modifications is to improve fixation between the metallic cups and surrounding bone. Radiographs have historically been used to evaluate the implant-to-bone fixation around the acetabular cups. In general, a well fixed cup shows no gaps or radiolucency around the cup9s outer diameter. In post-operative radiographs, the presence of progressive radiolucent zones of 2mm or more around the implant in the three radiographic zones is indicative of aseptic loosening, as described by DeLee and Charnley [1]. In this cadaveric study, we investigated the X-ray image characteristics of two different types of acetabular shell surfaces (2D and 3D) to evaluate the implant-to-bone interface in the two designs. Methods Six human cadavers were bilaterally implanted with acetabular cups by an orthopaedic surgeon. 2D surface cups (Trident, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) and 3D surface cups (Tritanium, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) were randomized between the left and right acetabula. The surgeon used his regular surgical technique (1 mm under reaming) to implant the acetabular cups. The cadavers were sent for X-ray imaging after the operation, Figure 1A. Following the X-ray imaging, the acetabular cups were carefully resected from the cadavers. Enough bone around the cups was retained for analysis of the implant-to-bone interface by contact X-ray. The acetabular cups with the surrounding bone were fixed in 70% isopropyl alcohol for about a week and subsequently embedded in polymethyl methacrylate. The embedded cups were sectioned at 30° intervals using a diamond saw in the coronal plane, as recommended by Engh et al [2], Figure 1B. The sectioning of the samples produced 6 slices of each cup where the implant-bone interface could easily be visualized for evaluation with contact X-ray. Results The AP X-rays of the cadavers demonstrated radiolucent lines, as well as gap defects in some cases. The same phenomenon was observed on the contact X-rays of the embedded implant sections as well, where one could easily identify the gap between the metal cup and the surrounding bone. The most striking finding was that, in a few cases, the contact X-rays showed radiolucency around the metal cup whereas the physical section did not seem to have any gaps. This phenomenon is illustrated in Figure 2. Conclusions The physical gap or radiolucent lines around the acetabular cups have been reported in literature; however, they seem to fill up with time as biological fixation progresses between the surrounding bone and the implant. In our study we found radiolucency that was not associated with the presence of a physical gap. In contrast, we found gaps on physical sections that were not correlated with radiolucencies. This phenomenon may be attributed to the interaction of X-rays with the cup surface modifications. The contact X-ray images demonstrated that radiolucency around cups may not always correlate with physical gaps. Further analysis is required to understand the implications of these findings.