Optimization of Scan and Reconstruction Parameters for Renal Artery CT Angiography with Iterative Reconstruction at Low kVp Compared with Filtered Back Projection at 120 kVp Acquisition

Background: As cross-sectional images expanded in clinical practice, the number of renal lesions discovered incidentally has been increasing. CT protocols for renal mass evaluation may include pre- and post-contrast phase. However, a major concern with respect to those multiphase techniques is often the radiation dose. One further critical issue is how to minimize the radiation dose while image quality is optimized in routine daily clinical practice. Objectives: To evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of renal artery CT angiography (CTA) with optimal sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) strength level at 80 kVp for optimizing the scan and reconstruction parameters of renal artery CTA, in comparison to 120 kVp acquisition with filtered back projection (FBP). Patients and Methods: Sixty consecutive patients were classified into three groups prospectively in this study: 1) 80 kVp group (n = 30) with FBP and 2) 80 kVp group with SAFIRE (S4) and 3) 120 kV group (n = 30) with FBP. CT values and noise were measured, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the renal artery CTA were calculated for quantitative assessment. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two experienced abdominal radiologists with a five-point scale in a blinded and randomized setting for qualitative assessment. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated and estimated for each subject presented in this study. Results: As for quantitative assessment, CNR, SNR and CT values of renal artery in 80kVp group with SAFIRE strength levels or FBP were higher than those of 120 kVp group with FBP (all Ps < 0.05), the mean noise gradually decreased in 80kVp group when increasing the SAFIRE strength levels (S1 - S5). As for qualitative assessment, the overall image quality, vessel sharpness, segmental renal artery displayed in maximum intensity projection (MIP) or multiplanar reformation (MPR), and diagnostic confidence of the two groups were all accepted by two radiologists (inter-observer agreement ranged from 0.600 to 0.940) (score ≥ 3). The overall image quality of 80 kVp with SAFIRE 4 was similar to that of 120 kVp group with FBP (P = 0.412), as well as segmental renal artery displayed in MIP and diagnostic confidence (P = 0.095 and P = 0.061, respectively). As for radiation dose reduction, 80kVp group could reduce 32.7% CTDIvol and 31.2% SSDE compared to the 120 kVp group. Conclusion: In patients with BMI lower than 28 kg/m2, renal artery CTA at 80 kVp with SAFIRE is feasible and can provide satisfactory images for clinical applications. This method also provides reduction in radiation dose. SAFIRE strength level 4 is recommended for reconstructing renal artery CTA.