Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with lymphoblastic lymphoma

Lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) in children is curable in most cases, but there is still a significant proportion of patients in whom standard therapy is ineffective. Thus, patients develop a relapse or a primary refractory disease in about 10% of cases (R/R). In this case, the main treatment method is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The choice in favor of transplantation is predominantly based on the experience in adult patients. A small number of pediatric patients accounts for the limited data in pediatrics. The prognosis of these patients is always extremely poor. It has been shown that the survival of patients after allo-HSCT is higher only if remission is achieved prior to the transplantation. In order to provide more evidence in support of allo-HSCT, randomized clinical trials are needed. However, such studies in the field of allo-HSCT are quite difficult to conduct, and this necessitates the search for alternative methods of evidence-based medicine in this area. Probably, the achievement of high survival rates could be considered a sufficient argument in favor of this method. This study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientific Council of the I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia. In this work, we summarize the experience in allo-HSCT in children with R/R LBL obtained at the R.M. Gorbacheva Research Institute for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University. This work is one of the few ones devoted exclusively to the role of alloHSCT in the treatment of pediatric R/R LBL. From 2006 to 2020, at the R.M. Gorbacheva Research Institute for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantation, I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University, allo-HSCT was performed in 13 children and adolescents with R/R LBL (2 patients underwent 2 transplantations). Repeated transplantations were performed due to progression and primary graft failure. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2.5 (2–4). Remission prior to alloHSCT was observed in 7 cases. The graft sources were a fully HLA-matched related donor (n = 3), a fully HLA-matched unrelated donor (n = 4), and a haploidentical donor (n = 8). The following schedules were used as a conditioning regimen: fludarabine 150 mg/m2 + busulfan 8–14 mg/kg (n = 8), fludarabine 150 mg/m2 + melphalan 140 mg/m2 (n = 5), fludarabine 150 mg/m2 + treosulfan 30 mg/m2 (n = 2). In most cases, the prevention of “graft versus host” disease (GVHD) was based on post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 11). Cyclophosphamide alone was used in fully matched related transplantation (n = 2), in combination with tacrolimus and cellsept – in unrelated transplantation (n = 1), and in combination with sirolimus and tacrolimus – in haploidentical transplantation (n = 8). A combination of ATGAM, methotrexate and cyclosporin A was used three times in alloHSCT from an unrelated donor for the prevention of GVHD. In one allo-HSCT from a fully matched related donor, cyclosporin A alone was used for the prevention of GVHD. The graft sources were bone marrow (n = 9) and peripheral blood stem cells (n = 4). The median CD34+ cells/kg was 3.8 (1.1–10.0). At the median follow-up of 651 (106–3034) days, the 3-year event-free survival rate was 52% (95% CI: 25–74), the incidence of relapse/progression was 48% (95% CI: 26–76). Five out of thirteen patients died during the study period. The cause of death was the underlying disease in all cases. The cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 28% (95% CI: 11–58%) and 24% (95% CI: 5–48), respectively. This work is one of the largest in terms of the number of transplanted children with R/R LBL. Our results are superior to those obtained in case of using only chemotherapy in comparison with the historical control and are comparable with the few previously published data on allo-HSCT in children. In this study, we included patients who underwent allo-HSCT. Among them, there were also children out of remission of LBL which implies that there was no selection of patients, and thus our study settings were close to the so-called real clinical settings. The drawbacks of this work include the following: the study was carried out at a single transplant center, there was no comparison group, the number of patients was low. Nevertheless, considering the complexity of conducting randomized trials in the field of allo-HSCT, the presented data serve as an important confirmation of the effectiveness of transplantation in R/R LBL.