Evaluation of the Depth of Myometrial Invasion of Endometrial Carcinoma: Comparison of Orthogonal Pelvis-axial Contrast-enhanced and Uterus-axial Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI Protocols.

Rationale and Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of orthogonal pelvis-axial (OPA) contrast-enhanced (CE) and orthogonal uterus-axial (OUA) dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols in assessing the depth of myometrial invasion (MI) of endometrial carcinoma (EC). Materials and Methods Preoperative MRI of 398 consecutive EC patients (197 patients with OPA CE-MRI protocol and 201 patients with OUA DCE-MRI protocol) was analyzed. Two radiologists independently interpreted the depth of MI, with postoperative histopathology as the reference standard. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used for diagnostic performance comparison. Results OUA DCE-MRI showed a significantly larger area under the curve than OPA CE-MRI in detecting the presence of MI for radiologist 1 (0.71 versus 0.49, p 0.05). Compared to OPA CE-MRI, OUA DCE-MRI significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of non-MI and superficial MI (radiologist 1: 45.5% versus 0 and 88.7% versus 86.4%, p = 0.045 and 0.567, respectively; radiologist 2: 45.5% versus 12.5% and 88.7% versus 78.8%, p = 0.177 and 0.027, respectively) and of EC with adenomyosis/submucous myomas, cornual tumor, and antero-posterior diameter ≤ 10 mm (radiologist 1: 86.4% versus 71.4%, 91.2% versus 67.7%, and 90.1% versus 81.1%, p = 0.048, 0.018, and 0.081, respectively; radiologist 2: 86.4% versus 64.3%, 88.2% versus 64.5%, and 87.0% versus 71.6%, p = 0.006, 0.023, and 0.019, respectively). Conclusion The OUA DCE-MRI protocol was superior to the OPA CE-MRI protocol in assessing the depth of MI of EC.