Capturing step counts at slow walking speeds in older adults: comparison of ankle and waist placement of measuring device.

Objective: It is important for older adults to be physically active, but many older adults walk slowly. This study examined the accuracy of a commercially available step-count device (Fitbit One) at slow speeds and compared the accuracy of the device when worn at the ankle and waist in older adults. Methods: The Fitbit One was placed at the ankle and waist of participants (n=42; mean age 73 years) while they performed walking trials at 7 different speeds (0.3–0.9 m/s). Step counts obtained from video recordings were used as the gold standard comparison to determine the accuracy of the device. Results: The ankle-worn device had significantly less error than the waist-worn device at all speeds. The percentage error of the ankle-worn device was less than 10% at speeds of 0.4–0.9 m/s and did not record zero steps at any speed. The percentage error of the waist-worn device was below 10% at only the 2 fastest speeds (0.8 and 0.9 m/s) and recorded zero steps for numerous participants at speeds of 0.3–0.5 m/s. Conclusion: The Fitbit One can accurately capture steps at slow speeds when placed at the ankle and thus may be ap