Comparision of the short-term clinical outcomes of on-pump and off-pump CABG in high-EuroSCORE patients

Objective Analysis the clinical data of high-EuroSCORE 114 patients due to ronary surgery to elucidatethe surgical advantages between on-pump and off-pump CABG.Methods From September 2008 to March 2011,114 highEuroSCORE patients due to coronary surgery were randomly divided into off-pump group 48,and on-pump gronp 66 cases.Preoperative,intra-operative and peri-operative clinical data of all the patients were collected.All patients were followed up for 1 month postoperatively.Results The baseline of the two groups had no significant difference.Application of internal mammary artery,positive inotropic drugs and IABP assistance between the two groups were similar,P ＞0.05,Compared with the offpump group,patients in on-pump gnup had longer operation time,hut more graft counts and a higher rate of revascularization [ (3.71±0.55)gnifis vs.(2.82±0.39)grafts ],P ＜ 0.05.There were no significant differences of peri-operative mortality and post-operative complications between the two groups,P ＞0.05.The patients in on-pump group had more post-operative chest drainage in the first 24 hours[ (875.0±134.2)ml vs.(589.4±102.5)ml] and blood transfusion[ (656.3±84.4)ml vs.(433.3±62.9) ml ] compared with the off-pump group,P ＜ 0.05.The data of l-month follow up denonstrated that echocardiographic data,NYHA and symptoms of angina of the two groups had no significant difference,P ＞ 0.05.Conclusion Compared with OPCAB,CCAB did not increase postoperative renal failure,neurological complications and lung injury in highrisk patients,but had more complete revascularization.The disadvantage of CCAB was postoperative bleeding,blood productsuse. Key words: Coronary arteriosclerosis; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Coronary artery bypass,off-pump; EumSCORE