Attitudes towards involving children in decision-making surrounding lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND Medical care has shifted from a paternalistic model towards one centered around patient autonomy and shared decision-making (SDM), yet the role of the pediatric patient in decision-making is unclear. Studies suggest that many children with chronic disease are capable of making medical decisions at a young age, yet no standardized approaches have been developed for involving children in these decisions. METHODS This is a single-center survey study investigating the attitudes of pediatric pulmonologists towards involvement of children in decisions regarding lung transplantation, utilizing a hypothetical case scenario with systematic manipulation of age and maturity level. We evaluated physician belief regarding ultimate decision-making authority, reconciliation of parent-child discordance, and utility of ethics and psychiatry consultation services. RESULTS The majority of pediatric pulmonologists at this center believe decision-making authority rests with the parents. The effects of age and maturity are unclear. In instances of parent-child disagreement, physicians are more likely to try to convince parents to defer to the child if the child is both older and more mature. Physicians are divided on the utility of ethics and psychiatry consultations. CONCLUSION Involvement of children with cystic fibrosis in SDM is broadly supported but inconsistently implemented. Despite evidence that children with chronic disease may have decisional capacity at a young age, the majority of physicians still grant decisional authority to parents. There are numerous barriers to involving children in decisions, including legal considerations. The role of age and maturity level in influencing these decisions appears small and warrants further investigation.