S2 The impact of pulmonary rehabilitation (pr) completion and outcome on subsequent hospital admissions in patients with copd. results from the national copd audit

Introduction Clinical trials suggest attendance at PR reduces subsequent hospitalisation rates. However, whether this benefit occurs in routine clinical practice is uncertain. We analysed admission rates and days spent in hospital 90 and 180 days after assessment for PR in the 2015 national PR audit cohort. Methods PR services across England and Wales provided data for all consenting patients assessed for PR between Jan and April 2015. Cumulative rates of admission to hospital and numbers of days spent in hospital at each timepoint (and between the 90 and 180 day timepoints) were extracted from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and compared between patients who did and did not complete PR and between those reaching and not reaching accepted thresholds for clinically important improvements (MCIDs) in exercise and health status measures. Results Data for 7135 patients included in the audit in England were extracted. Overall admission rates (proportion with at least one admission) were18.6% and 29.6% at 90 and 180 days respectively. At each timepoint, completion of PR (defined by there being a discharge assessment) was associated with a reduced risk of admission to hospital (compared with non-completion) (90 days: 13.1 vs 26.4%; 180 days: 23.7 vs 37.9%; 91–180 days: 15.0 vs 21.7%; all p Conclusion Successful completion of PR is associated with reduced risk of hospitalisation and reduced days in hospital up to 180 days after assessment. Although some of this effect may be due to case-mix variation, actions to enhance uptake and completion rates for PR may be effective measures to reduce health care resource utilisation for patients with COPD.