Impact of the Sensory Environment on Balance in Children with Bilateral Cochleovestibular Loss

Abstract Background The aim of the present study was to determine the role of auditory and visual sensory input on balance in children with bilateral cochlevestibular loss. The prevalence of vestibular impairment, and specifically bilateral vestibular loss (BVL) in children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is high and children with profound cochleovestibular loss (SNHL-BVL) have impaired balance (Suarez et al., 2007; Suarez et al., 2019). Given that both hearing and vestibular impairments are often congenital or acquired in early life, it remains difficult to tease out the individual developmental impact of either one on balance and spatial awareness in children who experience both of these sensory deficits. While cochlear implants (CI) can provide or restore access to sound in children with SNHL-BVL, there is currently no vestibular prosthetic available for clinical use in this population. These children may also use their intact sensory inputs (i.e. vision) to a greater extent to support balance. Alternately, restoring or providing access to sound may, on its own, help these children to balance better. We hypothesized that balance in children with SNHL-BVL who use bilateral CIs is: 1) improved in the presence of directional sound and 2) impaired when visual cues are dynamic (moving) rather than static. Methods Balance was assessed in 18 children with SNHL-BVL and 34 typically developing children with intact vestibular function and normal hearing by performing the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency–2 (BOT-2) balance subtest in a virtual-reality simulator under 4 sensory conditions of graded complexity. Randomized conditions combined 2 auditory (moving directional street sounds vs. directionless static white noise) and 2 visual (dynamic street scene vs. stationary street scene) stimuli designed to recreate a “real-world” busy downtown street. Balance ability in children with SNHL-BVL was also compared with CI on and off. Results As expected and similar to previous work, balance was significantly worse in the children with SNHL-BVL compared to typically developing children in all sensory conditions (p Conclusions Balance ability in children with SNHL-BVL who use bilateral CI was, as expected, poorer than their typically developing peers in all sensory conditions but improved slightly when they had access to any sound through their implants, with this benefit increasing as duration of implant use increased. This suggests that providing sound inputs through bilateral CIs positively affects balance in children with SNHL-BVL where vestibular and/or auditory inputs are compromised. This benefit was achieved even with auditory inputs that were devoid of moving directional cues (i.e. directionless static white noise) and is consistent with poor spatial hearing in children using bilateral CI.