The Boundless World of Cranioplasty: A Multicenter Retrospective Study and Therapeutic Flow-Chart Patient-Specific Based

Background Cranioplasty is both a functional and aesthetical therapeutic option. In the clinical scenario every cranioplasty's material is potentially qualified to achieve the goal of calvarian reconstruction but there is a lack of agreement about the optimum choice, especially between the heterologous ones. The choice of cranioplasty widely depends on surgeon's personal preferences. In this retrospective multicentric study a comparative analysis of hydroxyapatite or titanium cranioplasties was carried on analyzing the main factors considered by the surgeon to choose a material rather than another one. Our results and data were compared with those reported in the scientific literature and a flow-chart regarding the therapeutic approach in the choice of the most suitable cranioplasty was proposed and discussed. Methods The authors present a multicentric study considering 2 groups of patients who underwent 2 different kinds of cranioplasty: hydroxyapatite and titanium. The outcomes measures included the surgical timing and the maintenance of post-operative subgaleal drain. Results A total of 40 patients that had cranioplasty treatment were evaluated. The surgical technique was analyzed. In patients that underwent titanium cranioplasty we observed a reduction in the operative times and in subgaleal drain maintenance. In relation to the age, comorbidity, and neurological status a score, called most suitable material (MSM), was elaborated and a therapeutic algorithm is proposed. Conclusions This study confirms the known advantages and drawback of titanium and hydroxyapatite prostheses. Thanks to the lessons learned from our experience on this field, we elaborated the MSM score that coupled with the therapeutic flow-chart proposed could address the choice of the MSM for a specific patient.