[The comparison of step-down pharmacotherapy and maintaining dose therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis].

Objective:There is no standard algorithm for the modulation of pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis. This study aimed to recruited allergic rhinitis patients caused by cypress pollens, and compare the step-down pharmacotherapy guided by pollen count and the maintaining therapy which keeps the previous medicine dose when the pollen count decreased. Method:This was a randomized, open-labelled, parallel control study. During the period after the pollen peak when the cypress pollen count decreased and stayed at a low level, allergic rhinitis patients were randomly divided into two groups. In the step-down groupn=67 medicine dose was reduced, while the maintaining groupn=68 kept taking the same dose as in the peak season. The rhinitis symptom score and medicine score of these two groups were recorded and compared. Result:The daily rhinitis symptom score of the step-down group showed no significant difference with the symptom score of the maintaining group, 2.45+/-0.32 vs 2.43+/-0.41, P=0.788. But the medicine score of step-down group3.67+/-0.98 was significantly lower than that of maintaining group4.78+/-0.70, P<0.001. The compliance of step-down group80.6% was also better than maintaining group60.3%, P=0.014. However, in the subgroup of patients with severe rhinitis symptoms, the symptoms of patients taking step-down therapy tended to be more severe than those maintaining the same dose. Conclusion:During the later period of the pollen season when the pollen count was relatively low, the step-down pharmacotherapy guided by pollen count could reduce the medication use, increase the compliance of patients while controlling their rhinitis symptoms effectively. But this strategy might be more suitable for patients with milder symptoms, the severe rhinitis sufferers should be cautious before reducing their medicine dose.