Wallstents and Craggstents in Hemodialysis Grafts and Fistulas: Results for Selective Indications☆

Purpose To report the value of selective placement of self-expandable stents (Wallstent and Craggstent) for the treatment of limitations and, occasionally, of complications of dilation in hemodialysis access, and especially for delaying restenosis. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of a 7-year period, during which 41 Wallstents and 11 Craggstents were placed in 26 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts, 15 native fistulas, and nine central veins of 47 patients. The indications were stenosis recoil ( n  = 13), recurrent restenosis within 6 months ( n  = 33), restenosis after 6 months ( n  = 3), and acute angioplasty-induced rupture ( n  = 1). Restenosis after stent placement necessitated redi-lation and percutaneous declotting and 10 additional stent placements. Results Two initial misplacements were corrected immediately. Primary patency rates for PTFE grafts were 58% ± 10% at 6 months and 23% ± 10% at 1 year, respectively. Secondary patency rates were 100% at 6 months and 88% ± 8% at 1 year, respectively. For native fistulas, primary patency rates were 47% ± 12% at 6 months and 20% ± 18% at 1 year. Secondary patency rates were 95% ± 6% at 6 months and 79% ± 14% at 1 year. It was necessary to reintervene after stent placement to maintain or to restore patency every 9 months for PTFE grafts and every 7.3 months for native fistulas. When stents were placed for treatment of early recurring restenosis, the mean interval between radiologic interventions (redilations or declottings) performed to maintain or to restore patency before stent placement was multiplied by 2.1 after stent placement for both grafts (3.2 months increased to 6.9, P Conclusions Wallstents and Craggstents are valuable for the treatment of failure of regular dilation and they double the intervals between reinterventions for early (