Surgical treatment for long head of the biceps tendinopathy: a network meta-analysis

Background Surgical options for pathology affecting the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) include tenotomy and tenodesis, both of which can be performed with a variety of fixation methods. This study aimed to compare surgical treatment options for LHBT lesions using a network meta-analysis of published clinical studies. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical studies comparing surgical treatment options for LHBT lesions were included. Postoperative outcomes were compared between surgical treatment options using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis. Results There were 22 studies comparing surgical treatment options for LHBT pathology including arthroscopic tenotomy, arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis, arthroscopic intracuff tenodesis, and open subpectoral tenodesis, consisting of 1804 patients. Compared with arthroscopic tenotomy, open subpectoral tenodesis resulted in a significantly greater American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean difference, 4.58; P = .014). On the basis of the P-score, all 3 tenodesis techniques ranked above tenotomy with respect to the Constant score. Compared with arthroscopic tenotomy, the incidence of Popeye deformity was reduced with arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis (odds ratio [OR], 0.23; P Conclusion Lesions of the LHBT treated with open or arthroscopic tenodesis resulted in comparatively superior functional outcomes and a lower incidence of Popeye deformity, whereas arthroscopic intracuff tenodesis resulted in a higher incidence of bicipital groove pain.