Peripheral Central Vein Catheterization and Complete Implantable Infusion Port Through Internal Jugular Vein in Chemotherapy of Tumor Patients

To investigate the application effect of peripheral central vein catheterization (PICC) and transjugular veincompletely implantable infusion port in chemotherapy of tumor patients, and to analyze the difference betweenthe two ways of establishing venous pathway. In the average time of catheterization, the average time ofcatheterization in group A (80.29 ±30.52) was shorter than that in group B (252.26 ±124.33), and the differencewas statistically significant (t=11.633, P<0.05); the Karnfsky score of group B (81.60 ±14.75) was higher thanthat of group A (70.35 ±13.62), and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.853, P<0.05); In terms ofcatheter-related infection, the incidence of catheter-related infection in group B was lower than that in group A,and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.792, P<0.05); The difference between group B and group Bwas significantly lower in group B than in group A, and the difference between groups was statisticallysignificant (χ2=6.822, P<0.05). Peripheral central vein catheterization and complete implantable infusion portthrough internal jugular vein have positive effects in tumor patients with chemotherapy. Considering theeconomic situation of the patients, the catheterization mode of the peripheral central vein is more in line with theactual economic situation of the patients, but from the postoperative complications of the catheter and thequality of life of the patients, the completely implantable infusion port catheterization through the internaljugular vein is better.