Using the Hendrich II Inpatient Fall Risk Screen to Predict Outpatient Falls After Emergency Department Visits

2018 
Objectives To evaluate the utility of routinely collected Hendrich II fall scores in predicting returns to the emergency department (ED) for falls within 6 months. Design Retrospective electronic record review. Setting Academic medical center ED. Participants Individuals aged 65 and older seen in the ED from January 1, 2013, through September 30, 2015. Measurements We evaluated the utility of routinely collected Hendrich II fall risk scores in predicting ED visits for a fall within 6 months of an all‐cause index ED visit. Results For in‐network patient visits resulting in discharge with a completed Hendrich II score (N = 4,366), the return rate for a fall within 6 months was 8.3%. When applying the score alone to predict revisit for falls among the study population the resultant receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64. In a univariate model, the odds of returning to the ED for a fall in 6 months were 1.23 times as high for every 1‐point increase in Hendrich II score (odds ratio (OR)=1.23 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.19–1.28). When included in a model with other potential confounders or predictors of falls, the Hendrich II score is a significant predictor of a return ED visit for fall (adjusted OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.10–1.20, AUC=0.75). Conclusion Routinely collected Hendrich II scores were correlated with outpatient falls, but it is likely that they would have little utility as a stand‐alone fall risk screen. When combined with easily extractable covariates, the screen performs much better. These results highlight the potential for secondary use of electronic health record data for risk stratification of individuals in the ED. Using data already routinely collected, individuals at high risk of falls after discharge could be identified for referral without requiring additional screening resources.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    28
    References
    8
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []