Safety and efficacy compared between irinotecan-loaded microspheres HepaSphere and DC bead in a model of VX2 liver metastases in the rabbit.

Abstract Purpose To compare irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere (BioSphere Medical, Roissy-en-France, France) and DC Bead (Biocompatibles UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom) embolization microspheres for distribution in tumors, release properties, tolerance, and antitumor effects in a model of liver metastases in the rabbit. Materials and Methods Multiple liver tumors were created by injection of a VX2 cell suspension in the portal vein of rabbits. After 2 weeks, embolization of the proper hepatic artery was performed with a fixed volume of bland HepaSphere (n = 5), irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere (n = 6), or irinotecan-loaded DC Bead (n = 5) microspheres. Untreated animals injected with VX2 cells served as control animals (n = 5). Plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolite SN38 were assessed. Histopathology and gene expression analysis were performed 3 days after treatment. Results Among all treated groups, there was no significant difference in liver enzymes or liver damage on histology. Irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere microspheres showed a faster release of drug than DC Bead microspheres leading to a twofold higher concentration of drug in plasma for HepaSphere microspheres. HepaSphere microspheres were less frequently found inside tumor nodules on histology than DC Bead microspheres (11% vs 48%, P P = .006 and P = .047). Conclusions HepaSphere and DC Bead microspheres loaded with irinotecan caused significant necrosis of tumor nodules in a model of VX2 liver metastases. This outcome was mostly due to irinotecan delivery rather than vascular occlusion by the microspheres and was greater for HepaSphere microspheres compared with DC Bead microspheres.