Contemporary Analysis of Senior Level Case Volume Variation between Traditional Vascular Surgery Fellows and Integrated Vascular Surgery Chief Residents.

Abstract Background The present study compares the senior level operative experience of graduates from the traditional vascular surgery fellowship (5+2) and integrated vascular surgery training programs (0+5) using contemporary operative case log data. Methods The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) integrated vascular surgery, vascular surgery fellowship, and general surgery case logs for trainees graduating between 2013 and 2018 were queried for vascular surgery procedures. ‘Senior’ cases were categorized as cases logged as ‘Surgeon Fellow’ by 5 + 2 trainees or ‘Surgeon Chief’ (PGY-4,5) by 0 + 5 trainees. Overall case volume was defined as the combined volume of cases logged as ‘Surgeon Junior’, ‘Surgeon Chief’, ‘Surgeon Fellow’, ‘Teach Assist’, ‘First Assist’, or ‘Secondary procedure’. To reflect total vascular experience, all vascular cases done during general surgery residency were combined with cases performed during vascular surgery fellowship. Mean case volumes were compared for all operations/procedures. Results The 5+2 trainees had higher mean volume of open repair of suprarenal aortic aneurysms (2.4 vs 1.4, p = 0.0026) and open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms (0.5 vs 0.3, p = 0.004) at the fellow level compared to 0+5 surgeon chief cases. Additionally, 5+2 trainees performed more endovascular repair of abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (44.7 vs 28.4, p Conclusion Although both pathways graduate trainees with a similar overall surgical experience, 5 + 2 trainees log significantly more ‘Senior’ cases. Further studies investigating potential variation in operative autonomy between both pathways are necessary.