Conservative and surgical treatment of pediatric asymptomatic lumbosacral lipoma: a meta-analysis

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of surgical and conservative treatments of pediatric asymptomatic lumbosacral lipomas, and to address whether the patients can benefit from prophylactic surgeries. The literature reports of surgical and conservative treatments of child asymptomatic lumbosacral lipomas were reviewed and collected, and a meta-analysis of the reports regarding the incidence of sphincter and lower limb dysfunctions was performed. A total of five literatures were collected, containing a total of 403 patients, among which 124 patients received conservative treatments with 32 (25.81%) cases developing neurological dysfunctions during follow-up, and 279 received prophylactic surgical treatments with 30 (10.75%) patients developing neurological dysfunctions in follow-up, the difference being statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). For pediatric asymptomatic lumbosacral lipomas of the three major subtypes, the limited source of literature so far suggests that prophylactic surgery is superior to conservative strategy in preventing the patients from neurological deterioration. Larger patient cohorts, randomized studies, and longer length of follow-ups are needed for further corroboration.