Pathological characteristics of cervical adenocarcinoma in a multi-center U.S.-based study

Abstract Objective Difficulties in detecting cervical adenocarcinoma early are well known. We report a detailed pathology review of cervical adenocarcinoma subtypes, comparing growth patterns and appearance of non-neoplastic epithelium to inform possible clues for disease progression and early detection. Methods This analysis includes 154 women aged 18–69 years and diagnosed with incident in situ or invasive adenocarcinoma (AC), adenosquamous (AS), or other rare cervical glandular tumors from 1992–1996 in six U.S. medical centers. A pathology review panel evaluated histological features from original diagnostic slides. Results Higher tumor grade ( P P  = 0.002) were more common in AS compared to AC. Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) was also more common among AC than AS ( P  = 0.002). Among AC with cervical intraepithelial carcinoma (CIN), AIS and cribriform patterns were more common than AC without CIN ( P  = 0.01). Further, non-endometrioid AC had higher tumor grade ( P  = 0.01) and stromal responses ( P  = 0.02) than endometrioid AC. Finally, although microglandular hyperplasia is historically thought to be related to oral contraceptive (OC) use, our data do not support this notion. Conclusion(s) AS appears to be either diagnosed later or histologically more aggressive than AC, and among AC subtypes, there are distinct histologic characteristics. Further research is needed to identify precursor lesions for early detection of AC and particularly for AS where AIS may not be a common precursor.