What is the impact of a previously failed Robicsek repair in the subsequent treatment of sternal dehiscence with thermoreactive nitinol clips

BACKGROUND In this study, we conducted a retrospective review of patients at our institution with noninfectious sternal dehiscence (NISD) after median sternotomy who received thermoreactive nitinol clips (TRNC) treatment during a 10-year period. The purpose of the study was to analyze the impact of previous Robicsek repair on the later treatment of sternal dehiscence with TRCN to establish which method was better in high-risk patients with NISD. METHODS Between December 2009 and January 2020, out of 283 patients with NISD who underwent refixation, we studied 34 cases who received TRNC treatment. We divided these 34 cases into two groups: patients who had a previously failed Robicsek procedure before TRNC treatment (group A, n = 11) and patients who had been directly referred to TRCN treatment (group B, n = 23). High-risk patients were defined as those having three or more risk factors. RESULTS Postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in group A (p = .026). Hospitalization duration was significantly longer in group A due to the higher complication rate (p = .001). Operative time was significantly shorter and blood loss was significantly lower in group B (p = .001). CONCLUSION The Robicsek procedure is considered an effective method in the treatment of NISD but, in case of its failure, subsequent TRNC treatment might become cumbersome in high-risk patients. In our study, a previously failed Robicsek procedure caused significantly higher morbidity, additional operative risk and lower success rate in later TRNC treatment of high-risk cases. Ultimately, we speculate that a direct TRNC treatment for NISD is favorable in high-risk patients.