Are two readers more reliable than one? A study of upper neck ligament scoring on magnetic resonance images.
2013
Background
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies typically employ either a single expert or multiple readers in collaboration to evaluate (read) the image results. However, no study has examined whether evaluations from multiple readers provide more reliable results than a single reader. We examined whether consistency in image interpretation by a single expert might be equal to the consistency of combined readings, defined as independent interpretations by two readers, where cases of disagreement were reconciled by consensus.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
38
References
18
Citations
NaN
KQI