Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Improves Outcome of Patients > 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Complete Remission: A 10-Year Single Center Transplantation Program Analysis

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is a curative option for patients with AML in first complete remission (CR1), but is limited by the procedure-related toxicity and mortality. Thus, one could be reluctant for proceeding to Allo-HSCT in elderly patients, especially in the intermediate ELN risk group. While indications of Allo-HSCT for AML are consensual for younger patients, the benefit in older patients remains a matter of debate. In this analysis of a 10-year single center transplantation program for AML, we aim to show the feasibility and study the benefit of Allo-HSCT for CR1 AML in patients over 60 years of age. Inclusion criteria were: patients between 60 and 70 years of age; AML in first complete remission after intensive chemotherapy; ELN intermediate or unfavorable. Allo-HSCT was evaluated as a time dependent variable in survival calculations and in a multivariate Cox model adjusted on age (continuous), ELN group (intermediate vs. unfavorable) and time interval between induction therapy and CR1 (continuous). In addition, we used a multistate model as follow: initial state for all patients was “No Allo - CR” with time 0 at the time of CR after induction therapy. From initial state, patients can transit to “Allo - CR” at the time of transplantation, or go through 2 absorbing states: the non-relapse death in absence of Allo-HSCT (No Allo - NRM) and leukemia relapse in absence of Allo-HSCT (No Allo - Relapse). Similarly, once transplanted (i.e. in the state “Allo - CR”), patients can move to “Allo - Relapse” or “Allo - NRM” if they present relapse or non-relapse death, respectively. The model allows the dynamic prediction of probability for a patient to be in a specific state considering specific initial state and time. We analyzed all 187 consecutive patients who matched inclusion criteria. Median age was 65 years (range: 60-70). ELN risk was intermediate and unfavorable in 139 and 48 patients, respectively. While all had theoretical indication for Allo-HSCT in first CR, 83 were actually transplanted (44%). Reasons to not proceed to Allo-HSCT were patient or physician decision, absence of donor, relapse or NRM. In the entire cohort, 3-year progression free survival (PFS) was 48% after Allo-HSCT vs. 14% without Allo-HSCT, and 3-year overall was 53% after Allo-HSCT and 22% without Allo-HSCT. The time dependent Cox model showed that these differences are statistically significant in favor of Allo-HSCT (PFS: HR [95%CI]: 0.45 [0.29-0.69] p We conclude that Allo-HSCT for patients >= 60 years of age with CR1 AML is routinely feasible (44% actually transplanted), and significantly improves outcome in both intermediate and unfavorable ELN risk groups. In contrast with the setting of younger patients, long term survival is rare (less than 10%) without Allo-HSCT, even in intermediate risk group, supporting that Allo-HSCT remains the first curative option for these patients. Download : Download high-res image (228KB) Download : Download full-size image Figure 1 . Disclosures Charbonnier: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.