Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: Twelve-month follow-up study

2015 
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], St. Jude Medical) improves acute LV function and LV reverse remodeling at 3 months. Objective The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MPP can also improve LV function at 12 months. Methods Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical) were randomized to receive pressure–volume (PV) loop optimized biventricular pacing with either conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CONV) or MPP. CRT response was defined by a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥15% relative to BASELINE as determined by a blinded observer and alive status. Results Forty-four patients (New York Heart Association class III, ejection fraction [EF] 29% ± 6%, QRS 152 ± 17 ms) were enrolled and randomized to either CONV (N = 22) or MPP (N = 22). During the observation period, 2 patients died of noncardiac causes and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. After 12 months, 12 of 21 patients (57%) in the CONV group and 16 of 21 patients (76%) in the MPP group were classified as CRT responders ( P = .33). ESV reduction and EF increase relative to BASELINE were significantly greater with MPP than with CONV (ESV: median –25%, interquartile range [IQR] [–39% to –20%] vs median –18%, IQR [–25% to –2%], P = .03; EF: median +15%, IQR [8% to 20%] vs median +5%, IQR [–1% to 8%], P Conclusion Sustaining the trend observed 3 months postimplant, PV loop-guided multipoint LV pacing resulted in greater LV reverse remodeling and increased LV function at 12 months compared to PV loop-guided conventional CRT.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    24
    References
    92
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []