Longitudinal regret and information satisfaction after deciding on treatment for localized prostate cancer with or without a decision aid: Results at one-year follow-up in the PCPCC trial
2019
Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of including an online decision aid (DA) during prostate cancer treatment counseling on decisional regret and information satisfaction in a one-year follow-up. Methods Within a cluster RCT, 18 Dutch hospitals were randomized to DA counseling or care-as-usual, patients (n = 382) initially completed questionnaires directly after treatment decision making. Six and twelve months later regret (Decisional Regret Scale) and information satisfaction (SCIP-B) were assessed. Anxious and depressive symptoms (HADS) was included as possible covariate. Results After 12 months, 43 participants (15%) regretted their treatment choice and 105 participants (36%) were dissatisfied with the information that was received at the time of decision-making, regardless of being exposed to the DA. Anxious and depressive symptoms at follow-up were associated with regret and information dissatisfaction. Conclusion No long-term benefical effects emerged from DA usage compared to patients who underwent standard counseling. Practice implications During PCa treatment counseling, healthcare providers should be aware of anxious and depressive symptoms.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
22
References
13
Citations
NaN
KQI