Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches.

2021 
The field of dark matter detection is a highly visible and highly competitive one, with many collaborations around the world now seeking to directly detect dark matter in very sensitive detectors. To translate experimental data into a final published result, direct detection collaborations must make a series of choices in their analysis, choices ranging from how to model astrophysical parameters in projecting particle fluxes at the detector to how to make statistical inferences based on observed data. While many collaborations follow a standard set of recommendations in some areas, for example the expected flux of dark matter particles (to a large degree based on a paper from Lewin and Smith in 1995), in other areas, particularly in statistical inference, they have taken different approaches, often from result to result by the same collaboration. In this paper, we set out a number of recommendations on how to apply the now commonly used Profile Likelihood Ratio method to direct detection data. In addition, updated recommendations for the Standard Halo Model astrophysical parameters and relevant neutrino fluxes are provided, which are important for assessing dark matter sensitivity. The authors of this note include members of the DAMIC, DarkSide, DARWIN, DEAP, LZ, PandaX, PICO, SENSEI, SuperCDMS, and XENON collaborations, and these collaborations provided input to the recommendations laid out here. Wide-spread adoption of these recommendations will make it easier to compare and combine future dark matter results.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    124
    References
    4
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []