Assessment of baroreflex sensitivity has no prognostic value in contemporary, optimally managed patients with mild‐to‐moderate heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a retrospective analysis of 5‐year survival

OBJECTIVES:We evaluated the prognostic value of cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in contemporary, optimally treated patients with mild-to-moderate heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS:Data from 97 patients with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction 32 ± 6%, all receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker and beta-blocker, 85% receiving aldosterone antagonist) were analysed retrospectively. All patients underwent standard clinical assessment, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and BRS evaluation with three methods: the phenylephrine (BRS-Phe), the sequence (BRS-Seq) and the controlled breathing (BRS-CtrBr) method. Data on 5-year all-cause mortality and appropriate and documented implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharges were collected. During a mean follow-up of 53 ± 15 months, the composite endpoint of all-cause death and appropriate and documented ICD discharge occurred in 31 (32%) patients. BRS measures assessed using all three methods were not related to survival in univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses (all P >0.25). There were also no differences in survival between low vs. preserved BRS groups, irrespective of the method used for BRS assessment (all P ≥0.15). BRS-Phe correlated with several clinically important variables (including left ventricular ejection fraction: rS  = 0.27, and peak oxygen consumption: rS  = 0.32, both P < 0.05), while clinical associations of BRS-Seq and BRS-CtrBr were sparse. CONCLUSIONS:Assessment of cardiac BRS provides no prognostic information in the contemporary mild-to-moderate HFrEF population receiving optimal management.