Cardiac cinefluoroscopy as an inexpensive aid in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Abstract To compare the accuracy of cinefluoroscopy, exercise electrocardiography and thallium perfusion imaging in diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD), these 3 studies were performed in 297 subjects without prior acute myocardial infarction who were referred for coronary angiography. Of the 137 patients who had more than 50% angiographic diameter narrowing in at least 1 major coronary artery, 91 (67%) were correctly identified by cinefluoroscopy, 90 (66%) by stress electrocardiography and 100 (73%) by thallium imaging. Of the 164 patients with no more than 50% diameter narrowing, the proportion of patients correctly identified as normal were 81%, 72% and 79%, respectively. Cardiac cinefluoroscopy correctly classified 74% of the 297 subjects as to their disease status (more than 50% coronary narrowing), compared to 69% for stress electrocardiography and 76% for thallium imaging. There was no significant difference between the sensitivity or specificity of the test combination of stress electrocardiography and cinefluoroscopy and the combination of stress electrocardiography and thallium imaging. Cardiac cinefluoroscopy, a relatively cost-effective diagnostic test, is similar in accuracy to other, more expensive noninvasive diagnostic examinations for CAD.