Proteomic Analysis in Endometrial Cancer and Endometrial Hyperplasia Tissues by 2D-DIGE Technique

Abstract Objective To compare the protein expression of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial carcinoma and healthy endometrial tissues, and by this way, to identify proteins that can be used for diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic targets. Methods Histopathological examination of the D&C material had reported “benign endometrial changes”, “complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia” and “endometrioid adenocarcinoma” and 30 patients ,who underwent surgery with these diagnosis, were studied. Protein profiles of the study groups were detected using 2D-DIGE technique and compared to the control group. Protein spots which showing different expression, were defined by MALDI TOF/TOF-MS method. Results In the present study, significant elevations were observed in the levels of K2C8, UAP56, ENOA, ACTB, GRP78, GSTP1, PSME1, CALR, PPIA, PDIA3 and IDHc proteins when comparisons were made among the cancer cases and the healthy and complex atypical hyperplasia cases. We determined that the induction of CALR activity may be a factor that progresses apoptosis, thus, may be a hope for postoperative new chemotherapy treatment methods. Moreover, when the expressions of the CAH1 and PPIB proteins are compared to complex atypical hyperplasia and endometrial adenocarcinoma stages, we determined that the CAH1 and PPIB levels increased in more advanced stages. Among these indicators, the proteins that had the closest relation to advanced stage cancer were determined as K2C8, UAP56 and GRP78. Conclusion We think that it would be useful to determine the diagnosis, prediction of prognosis and identifying therapeutic targets of the highlighted proteins of our study that are K2C8, UAP56, GRP78 and CALR in endometrial cancer.