TCT-677 Multivessel Versus Culprit-Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Amartya Kundu,Partha Sardar,Nikolaos Kakouros,Dhaval Kolte,J. Dawn Abbott,Daniel Z. Fisher,Dmitriy N. Feldman

TCT-677 Multivessel Versus Culprit-Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: An Updated Meta-Analysis

2018

Amartya Kundu
Partha Sardar
Nikolaos Kakouros
Dhaval Kolte
J. Dawn Abbott
Daniel Z. Fisher
Dmitriy N. Feldman

There is considerable debate regarding the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS), particularly regarding the management of non-culprit lesions. We conducted an updated meta-analysis of studies comparing

Keywords:

Revascularization
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Myocardial infarction
Diabetes mellitus
Culprit
Lesion
Meta-analysis
Cardiology
Cardiogenic shock
Medicine
Internal medicine
in patient
culprit lesion

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations