Cost-effectiveness of prospective and continuous parenteral antibiotic control: Experience at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center from 1987 to 1989

Abstract purpose: Controlling inappropriate antibiotic usage is a major focus for hospital quality assurance and cost-containment programs. We assessed the impact of strengthening a parenteral antibiotic control policy and instituting continuous infectious disease service (IDS) reviews of the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy on cost and patient outcomes. patients and methods: All patients receiving intravenous antibiotics during a 3.5-year period from 1986 to 1989 were included in either the pre- or post-policy study group. Antibiotic costs 16 months before were compared with antibiotic costs 26 months after implementation of a new policy to restrict inappropriate usage of (1) broad-spectrum antibiotics when not necessary, (2) expensive agents when a less costly agent could be used, and (3) an excessive dosage or interval. Patient subgroups treated 4 months before and 4 months after policy implementation were compared further within diagnosis-related group (DRG) assignments using patient demographic, cost, and outcome measures. results: The average monthly antibiotic costs during the 26-month post-policy period were $7,600 less than during the 16-month pre-policy period (p conclusion: Antibiotic control policies can be developed to ensure quality care and can be designed to select for cost-effective agents. Prospective and continuous monitoring of antibiotic usage by the IDS resulted in a significant and sustained reduction in antibiotic costs without detrimental effect on the length of therapy or deaths.