Significant regional variation exists in morbidity and mortality after repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Abstract Objective Limited data exist comparing perioperative morbidity and mortality after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR) among regions of the United States. This study evaluated the regional variation in mortality and perioperative outcomes after repair of AAAs. Methods The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) was used to identify patients undergoing open AAA repair and EVAR between 2009 and 2014. Ruptured and intact aneurysms were evaluated separately, and the analysis of intact aneurysms was limited to infrarenal AAAs. All 16 regions of the VQI were deidentified, and those with  χ 2 and Fisher exact tests. Regional rates were compared against current quality benchmarks. Results Perioperative outcomes from 14 regions were compared. After open repair of intact aneurysms, no significant variation was seen in 30-day or in-hospital mortality; however, multiple regions exceeded the Society for Vascular Surgery benchmark for in-hospital mortality after open repair of intact aneurysms of  P  = .55). After EVAR, all regions met the Society for Vascular Surgery benchmark of  P  = .75). Significant variation in in-hospital mortality existed after open (14%-63%; P  = .03) and endovascular (3%-32%; P  = .03) repair of ruptured aneurysms across the VQI regional groups. After repair of intact aneurysms, wide variation was seen in prolonged length of stay (>7 days for open repair: 32%-53%, P  = .54; >2 days for EVAR: 16-43%, P P P P P P P P  = .04) and respiratory complications (6%-20%; P  = .20) were variable across regions. The frequency of endoleak at completion of EVAR also had considerable variation (15%-38%; P Conclusions Despite limited variation, multiple regions do not meet current benchmarks for in-hospital mortality after open AAA repair for intact aneurysms. Significant regional variation exists in perioperative outcomes and length of stay, and mortality is widely variable after repair for rupture. These data identify important areas for quality improvement initiatives and clinical practice guidelines.