Neuroimaging findings in headache with normal neurologic examination: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 
Abstract Objective To determine if pooled estimates of the prevalence of unexpected findings in patients with headache and normal neurologic examination support current expert opinion-based neuroimaging guidelines. Methods We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies reporting neuroimaging findings in patients with headache and normal neurologic examination up to September 30, 2017. The overall and disease-specific prevalence of unexpected findings were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD42017079714. Results In forty-one studies including 15,760 participants, the overall prevalence of unexpected findings and normal variants was 17.5% (95% CI: 13.1–22.3). The prevalence was 26.6% (95% CI: 15.5–39.4) in studies using MRI only. The prevalence of vascular, neoplastic, and non-neoplastic findings was 6.6%, 1.4%, and 9.6%. The pooled disease-specific prevalence was 2.0% for stroke, 1.8% for aneurysms, 0.8% for subdural hematoma, 0.7% for hydrocephalus, 0.2% for glioma, and 0.1% for meningioma. In secondary analysis, there was 0.4% increase in the prevalence of vascular unexpected findings with each 1% increase in the proportion of migraine with aura (p-value for meta-regression = 0.005). Conclusions In patients with headache and normal neurologic examination, important vascular and neoplastic unexpected findings are rare and better detected with MRI. This supports current American College of Radiology and European Headache Federation recommendations to avoid systematic imaging in such patients and prefer MRI when imaging is needed.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    82
    References
    3
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []