Posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation in preterm infants: When best to intervene?

Objective To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants with and without intervention for posthemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (PHVD) managed with an “early approach” (EA), based on ventricular measurements exceeding normal (ventricular index [VI] Methods Observational cohort study of 127 preterm infants (gestation Results Forty-nine of 78 (63%) EA and 24 of 49 (49%) LA infants received intervention. LA infants were slightly younger at birth, but did not differ from EA infants for other clinical measures. Initial intervention in the EA group occurred at younger age (29.4/33.1 week postmenstrual age; p +2 SD; p +2 SD; p = 0.3) but differed in the LA group (14/2.1 mm >+2 SD; p p −1 SD), despite intervention. LA infants with intervention had poorer outcomes than those without ( p Conclusion In preterm infants with PHVD, those with early intervention, even when eventually requiring a shunt, had outcomes indistinguishable from those without intervention, all being within the normal range. In contrast, in infants managed with LA, need for intervention predicted worse outcomes. Benefits of EA appear to outweigh potential risks. Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that for preterm infants with PHVD, an EA to management results in better neurodevelopmental outcomes than a LA.