Beating vs Arrested Heart Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery: Long-term Outcomes.

Abstract Background Isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is a rare procedure generally considered at high risk of perioperative mortality and poor long-term outcomes. Surgical treatment can be performed with either an arrested heart (AH) or beating heart (BH) technique. Aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of isolated tricuspid surgery with two different approaches. Methods The SUR-TRI study is a multicenter international retrospective study enrolling adult patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve procedures (n=406, 56±16 years; 56% female) at 13 international sites. AH and BH strategies were performed in 253 and 153 cases, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare groups. Results After matching, 129 pairs were obtained and analyzed. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.2 vs 5.0% in the AH and BH groups, respectively (p=0.9). The rates of acute renal failure requiring replacement therapy (3 vs 10%, p=0.02) and stroke (0 vs 1.8%, p=0.08) were numerically higher in the AH group. The 6-year survival rate was 67±6 vs 78±5% in the AH and BH groups, respectively (p=0.18), while freedom from cardiac death was 75±5 vs 84±4% (p=0.21). The six-year composite cardiac endpoint of cardiac death and reoperation rate was 60±9 vs 86±5% (p=0.024) comparing AH-TV replacement and BH-TV repair groups. Conclusions Isolated tricuspid valve surgery performed with a beating heart strategy is a safe option and resulted in a trend of increased long-term survival and freedom from reoperation when compared with the standard arrested heart technique. Patients undergoing beating heart valve repair had the best long-term outcome.