Comparison study between open and laparoscopic liver resection in a Saudi Tertiary Center

Objectives: To compare King Saud University Medical City experience in laparoscopic liver resection with our previously established database for open resections. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All adult patients who underwent liver resection from 2006 to 2017 were included. Patients who had their procedure converted to open were excluded. Results: Among the 111 liver resections included, 22 (19.8%) were performed laparoscopically and 89 (80.1%) were performed using the open technique. Malignancy was the most common indication in both groups (78.5%). The mean operative time was 275 min (SD 92.2) in the laparoscopic group versus 315 min (SD 104.3) in the open group. Intraoperative blood transfusion was required in the laparoscopic (9%) and open groups (31.4%). The morbidity rate was 13.6% in the laparoscopic group and 31.4% in the open group, and the mortality rate was 0% in the laparoscopic group and 5.6% in the open group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic liver resection appears to be a safe technique and can be performed in various benign and malignant cases. Saudi Med J 2019; Vol. 40 (5): 452-457 doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.5.24086 How to cite this article:  Al-Saif FA, Aldekhayel MK, Al-Alem F, Hassanain MM, Mattar RE, Alsharabi A. Comparison study between open and laparoscopic liver resection in a Saudi tertiary center.  Saudi Med J . 2019 May;40(5):452-457. doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.5.24086.