Prophylactic piperacillin administration in pediatric patients with solid tumors following different intensities of chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic antibiotics decrease mortality and morbidity in patients with hematological malignancies following intensive chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for pediatric patients with solid tumors remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 103 neutropenic periods from 26 patients with neuroblastoma or brain tumors following three different intensity chemotherapy regimens (05A3, A, and B). While piperacillin was intravenously administered as prophylaxis (PIPC prophylaxis group), the historical control group received no prophylaxis. As patients exhibited a variable degree of myelosuppression based on the intensity of the chemotherapy regimen, we separately evaluated the frequency and severity of febrile neutropenia (FN) in each regimen. RESULTS: Following intensive chemotherapy, we observed a significantly lower frequency of FN in the PIPC prophylaxis group compared with the historical control group in both regimen 05A3 (20% vs 65%; P = 0.01) and regimen A (56% vs 93%; P = 0.02). We also observed a shorter duration of fever, lower maximum fever, and lower C-reactive protein levels in the PIPC prophylaxis group compared with the historical control group after regimens 05A3 and A. Conversely, the frequency and severity of FN were not different between the two groups after moderate-intensity chemotherapy (regimen B). However, a longitudinal routine surveillance study of Pseudomonas aeruginosa also indicated a reduction in the susceptibility to PIPC throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although PIPC prophylaxis might provide an advantage for severe neutropenia in pediatric patients with solid tumors, there is concern regarding bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Therefore, further careful examination is necessary for adaptation.