Re-operation for complicated secondary peritonitis - how to identify patients at risk for persistent sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: There is an ongoing dispute on the benefit of planned relaparotomy for patients with diffuse peritonitis. SETTING: Surgery Department, university hospital. PATIENTS: 145 patients with diffuse peritonitis treated with planned relaparotomy were analysed for APACHE II, MOF- and MODS-score (Goris and Marshall), complications, outcome and clinical/laboratory factors indicating intra-abdominal compartment syndrome (positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP), central venous pressure (CVP), creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN)) after termination of planned relaparotomy. Statistical analysis of data (mean and standard deviation) was performed using Mann-Whitney, chi-square, ANOVA and multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall mortality was 29.7% and APACHE II score on admission 16.7 +/- 8.3. In 107 patients (mortality 17.8%) closure of the abdomen was achieved at termination of planned relaparotomy, 20 patients (mortality 30%) were treated with mesh closure and in 18 patients (mortality 100%) closure of the abdomen was not feasible. After closure of the abdomen 39 patients showed signs of persistent sepsis. Patients who were explored had a mortality of 37.5% and without re-exploration a mortality of 67%. BUN, PEEP and CVP were significantly different in survivors and non-survivors. Independent predictors of outcome were closure of the abdomen, complications, APACHE II and MOF scores. CONCLUSION: Patients with planned relaparotomy for diffuse peritonitis are not a uniform group and differ in mortality depending on source control and closure of the abdomen. Patients with persistent sepsis after termination of planned relaparotomy may be recognized by clinical and laboratory parameters and benefit from a timely reexploration. The decision when to close the abdomen may not only be based on intraperitoneal findings but also on the existence and level of organ failure.